State can give reservation in Supreme Court / Promotion; No need for bank account, SIM and school admission

The Supreme Court gave three important decisions Wednesday. The first assurance was on the compulsion. The apex court upheld the constitutional validity of the base. Said- 'It will be mandatory for the benefit of government schemes. However, it is not necessary for opening of admissions and bank accounts in schools. 'The second decision was on giving benefits of reservation in promotion in government jobs. On this, the court upheld its 2006 decision and said that states do not need to raise the figure for reservations in promotions. The live verdict of court proceedings was approved in the third verdict. The court said that it would bring transparency.

Where is the foundation, where not; Supreme Court Guidelines on this

 

"The basis is needed to take advantage of government schemes. Aadhaar card will be required to link the PAN card and file an Income Tax Return. "" Education has taken us towards signing with thumb impression. Now technology is taking us to the thumb mark with the signature, but the basis for admission in schools can not be made necessary. "" The basis for UGC, NET and CBSE examinations is not necessary. Without the permission of the court, biometric data should not be shared with any agency. "" Aadhaar card is not necessary for opening a bank account. "" Section 57 of the Aadhaar Act is canceled. Private companies will not be able to call the Aadhaar card. "" A basis for buying a mobile phone connection or a new SIM card is not necessary. "" No child can be deprived of any scheme benefits due to lack of support. can.''

 

The government-appointed government for the protection of the data: Justice Sikri and the Supreme Court said in its observation, "It is not necessary that everything should be best, some should be different (unique) also." The base works on empowering and recognizing the marginalized sections of society. The base is different than the other ID proof, since it can not be duplicated. Aadhaar number assigned to one person can not be given to any other person. The Center needs to make laws as early as possible to protect the data. The Government should ensure that no illegal migrant in the country is allotted Aadhaar card.

 

Remarks of Justice Chandrachud, different from the verdict - Delete the data of the base mobile companies

 

Justice D.V. Chandrachud said in separate comments from the decision that the mobile companies should delete the data of the base taken from the customers. '' The base data is sensitive. There is danger of abuse by a third party or any vendor. "" If you allow private companies to use the data of the base, they will profile the citizens and try to get their political views. It is a violation of privacy. "" Do you believe that every person who opens a bank account is a potential terrorist or money launderer? "" The basis has failed in his motive. It is impossible to remain in India without the basis today and it is a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. "" Passing the Aadhar Act as a money bill is a betrayal of the Constitution, "he said.

 

Old decision on reservation in promotion will be retained

Supreme Court refuses to re-think its decision on reservation in government jobs in 2006. This decision was given in the case of M Nagraj. It said that the state governments can give reservation in promotion with certain conditions, but for this, they will have to submit the figures of backward community. The Center said that the conditions have been made inadmissible. In this case, it should be sent to the judge of the seven judges for re-consideration.

 

No need to raise data for reservation in promotion: The Constitution bench of five judges headed by Chief Justice Deepak Mishra unanimously ruled. The Bench said that there is no need to collect the numerical data to state governments to give the SC-ST backwardness to give reservation. In 2006, the Bench of five judges had said that before giving reservation to the employees of these communities, the state government will present facts about their inadequate representation and administrative efficiency in government jobs.

 

Live Broadcast Approval

The Supreme Court also approved the live broadcast of the court proceedings and the video recording. The court said that it should start from the Supreme Court. Make rules for this. Broadcasting of court proceedings will result in accountability in the judicial system.

 

9 thousand crore profit from the government

Arun Jaitley described the Supreme Court's decision as historic He said that the Unique Identity Number (UIN) was accepted only after a legal review. Despite this implementation, Congress did not know what would happen from the base? 122 crore people have base cards in India. We believe that this can be ensured by identifying the beneficiaries of government schemes and preventing the interest of beneficiaries. The government is benefiting from it 90 thousand crore every year.